Saturday, January 23, 2010
Friday, January 22, 2010
What Happened in Massachusetts?
Indeed. How weird is it when a state that has been proud to be known to be a Mass (bad pun) of Kennnedy boot lickers revolts?
It hinges on 1) Obama showed himself to be a weak personality, a typical sneaky politician, and not very bright 2) Coakley said what she really thought too often 3) the white folks may have finally punched their "I am not a racist/sexist/homophobe tickets" enough to satisfy themselves.
Obama's performance on the job is highly reminiscent of Carter at his worst; flitting about the world apologizing on behalf of the US for everything from pretend global warming to the last administration tweaking their noses, ignoring huge unemployment, playing at "big picture" games while (not) working folk struggle. Strangely, even in Massachusetts those things matter.
Coakley managed to be the right candidate at the right time with stunning efficiency. She offended the observant catholic population of Mass. and showed herself to be abrasive, oblivious, and uninformed in a single stroke with her crack that perhaps Catholics should not work in emergency rooms. Chances are she was probably born in a Catholic hospital. I would like to think the folk in Mass. were starting to chaffe at Kennedy worship, but growing a spine is far too much to ask of the bootlickers. They are probably aquiver at having offended Obama.
It is a plain fact that even with a sorry assed candidate like McCain, the economy unraveling, and congress writing checks to banksters, had Obama been white he would have lost. As one roll in the hay is all playing the sympathy card will get you some folk, having finally voted for a black guy for high office president, are no longer carrying that particular monkey on their backs. The white folk are free to vote however they wish (unwisely most often - but not so much racially, except for black folk who vote racially always).
The race guilt card won't play again unless the left's commentariart manages to cook up some hitherto undiscovered subtle undercurrent of racism for which all white folks should feel guilty. And convince them of it. Not bloody likely outside of the DC stage, but good luck to 'em anyway.
It hinges on 1) Obama showed himself to be a weak personality, a typical sneaky politician, and not very bright 2) Coakley said what she really thought too often 3) the white folks may have finally punched their "I am not a racist/sexist/homophobe tickets" enough to satisfy themselves.
Obama's performance on the job is highly reminiscent of Carter at his worst; flitting about the world apologizing on behalf of the US for everything from pretend global warming to the last administration tweaking their noses, ignoring huge unemployment, playing at "big picture" games while (not) working folk struggle. Strangely, even in Massachusetts those things matter.
Coakley managed to be the right candidate at the right time with stunning efficiency. She offended the observant catholic population of Mass. and showed herself to be abrasive, oblivious, and uninformed in a single stroke with her crack that perhaps Catholics should not work in emergency rooms. Chances are she was probably born in a Catholic hospital. I would like to think the folk in Mass. were starting to chaffe at Kennedy worship, but growing a spine is far too much to ask of the bootlickers. They are probably aquiver at having offended Obama.
It is a plain fact that even with a sorry assed candidate like McCain, the economy unraveling, and congress writing checks to banksters, had Obama been white he would have lost. As one roll in the hay is all playing the sympathy card will get you some folk, having finally voted for a black guy for high office president, are no longer carrying that particular monkey on their backs. The white folk are free to vote however they wish (unwisely most often - but not so much racially, except for black folk who vote racially always).
The race guilt card won't play again unless the left's commentariart manages to cook up some hitherto undiscovered subtle undercurrent of racism for which all white folks should feel guilty. And convince them of it. Not bloody likely outside of the DC stage, but good luck to 'em anyway.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Facebook Fun
Ken - thinks there's just too many Neanderthals in this country clinging to their guns, religion and "freedom" of inequity.
JACIII
Oh Stop! You'll make me blush.
{liberal sap}
Indeed, Ken. Indeed.
Jac III
Why, oh why, do those dumb hicks not know we only want to help them? To make life better for all? They are just too stupid to know we know what's best for them. And they're still trying to keep the black man down!
Jac III
World Peace!
JACIII
Oh Stop! You'll make me blush.
{liberal sap}
Indeed, Ken. Indeed.
Jac III
Why, oh why, do those dumb hicks not know we only want to help them? To make life better for all? They are just too stupid to know we know what's best for them. And they're still trying to keep the black man down!
Jac III
World Peace!
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
One Big Wrong Turn or The Damage One Sorry Son of a Bitch Railroad Lawyer Can Do
From Murray Rothbard's Just War.
It is amazing how much fuckup can be traced to just a very short period of time the legacy of which is continued grief for generations removed from the evil deeds initiated by a very few evil men.
1) Prohibition - for which prisons overflow and privacy dies.
2) Income Tax - Whereby we are all slaves and ownership of our labor is claimed by bureaucrats and politicians.
3) Eminent Domain - The root of "corporate welfare" and condemnation (legal theft) of privately held property.
4) Gold Standard and Nationalized Banking System - See The Great Depression I and, now, II.
5) Credit Inflation - Bubbles anyone?
Further we are seeing more and more that the yankee (spit) deified state will tolerate no other god before it:
This worship of state is becoming obvious even to the obtuse as "Freedom of Religion" becomes corrupted toward "Freedom from religion other than worship of the state". What was yankee (spit) birthed is now irrational atheist borne.
Rothbard's reference to Milton's Moloch is especially apt:
Props to our token Jew Bankster, Josh, for the Rothbard link.
Lincoln signed no less than ten tariff-raising bills during his administration. Heavy "sin" taxes were levied on alcohol and tobacco, the income tax was levied for the first time in American history, huge land grants and monetary subsidies were handed out to transcontinental railroads (accompanied by a vast amount of attendant corruption), and the government went off the gold standard and virtually nationalized the banking system to establish a machine for printing new money and to provide cheap credit for the business elite. And furthermore, the New Model Army and the war effort rested on a vast and unprecedented amount of federal coercion against Northerners as well as the South; a huge army was conscripted, dissenters and advocates of a negotiated peace with the South were jailed, and the precious Anglo-Saxon right of habeas corpus was abolished for the duration.
It is amazing how much fuckup can be traced to just a very short period of time the legacy of which is continued grief for generations removed from the evil deeds initiated by a very few evil men.
1) Prohibition - for which prisons overflow and privacy dies.
2) Income Tax - Whereby we are all slaves and ownership of our labor is claimed by bureaucrats and politicians.
3) Eminent Domain - The root of "corporate welfare" and condemnation (legal theft) of privately held property.
4) Gold Standard and Nationalized Banking System - See The Great Depression I and, now, II.
5) Credit Inflation - Bubbles anyone?
Further we are seeing more and more that the yankee (spit) deified state will tolerate no other god before it:
The Union was taken, by its Northern worshipers, from a contractual institution that can either be cleaved to or scrapped, and turned into a divinized entity, which must be worshipped, and which must be permanent, unquestioned, all-powerful. There is no heresy greater, nor political theory more pernicious, than sacralizing the secular. But this monstrous process is precisely what happened when Abraham Lincoln and his northern colleagues made a god out of the Union. If the British forces fought for bad King George, the Union armies pillaged and murdered on behalf of this pagan idol, this "Union," this Moloch that demanded terrible human sacrifice to sustain its power and its glory.
This worship of state is becoming obvious even to the obtuse as "Freedom of Religion" becomes corrupted toward "Freedom from religion other than worship of the state". What was yankee (spit) birthed is now irrational atheist borne.
Rothbard's reference to Milton's Moloch is especially apt:
First MOLOCH, horrid King besmear'd with blood
Of human sacrifice, and parents tears,
Though for the noyse of Drums and Timbrels loud
Their childrens cries unheard, that past through fire
To his grim Idol.
Props to our token Jew Bankster, Josh, for the Rothbard link.
Even the Finns and Soviets Love the South
Bless their hearts.
from Bill.
Please note the hillbilly is riding a BMW in the last shot.
Congress Will Birth The Healthcare Abomination
All the election of Scott Brown will do, as fun as it has been to watch, is give a cloak of legitimacy for the congressional politburo to crouch behind whilst spinning sticky strands to further ensnare the public in its totalitarian web. Congress now has a failed president to sheild it from the full force of the publics ire; watch the toads get busy.
Coakley will be seen as a sacrificial lamb (or goat, depending on your point of view) by the commentariat served up to quench burning "Tea Party" sentiment. All will breathe a sigh of relief that it wasn't them and will go back to work destroying piecemeal the remnants of the free nation whose demise the Bastard Lincoln began.
Coakley will be seen as a sacrificial lamb (or goat, depending on your point of view) by the commentariat served up to quench burning "Tea Party" sentiment. All will breathe a sigh of relief that it wasn't them and will go back to work destroying piecemeal the remnants of the free nation whose demise the Bastard Lincoln began.
Monday, January 18, 2010
May Your Next Sights Be Trijicon
Because it torments these idiots so.
And wouldn't you know a damned pansy lawyer has his panties in a wad at the idea folks might err by worshiping God rather than his state?!
"It's wrong, it violates the Constitution, it violates a number of federal laws," said Michael "Mikey" Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, an advocacy group that seeks to preserve the separation of church and state in the military.
Proof positive you don't need to be able to think to string words together. There's not a thing wrong with that except most folk hear words well strung and assume that indicates reason.
"It violates the constitution"...... Which article exactly is that? Oh, yeah - "Congress shall buy no scope with biblical references marked upon them" that's the one.
Go See The Book of Eli
One of the best Christian films to come along in a long time, The Book of Eli mixes melancholy and sudden brutal violence in such a way as to have a viewer uncertain of whether the next sequence will be soliloquy or slaughter.
There is plenty of action, plenty of plot, but no boobs. (Hey, it's a Christian film.) And the official critics hate it for the same reasons everyone else loves it. The words "preachy" , "flawed", "doomily pompous", and my favorite quip "the constantly preachy tone tends to grate after a while, and nothing in the self-important, supposedly revelatory denouement makes up for having been fed so much irredeemably inexplicable hokum." Obviously, the socially autistic did not find it enjoyable; how dare someone make a movie without the obligatory disdain for western culture! They thought we were "past that".
That hollywood made this film amazes me, as it should you. I look for the sky to fall any day now.
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Objective Reality and What Passes for the Liberal "Mind"
Senator Harry Reid is being put through the wringer for stating these verifiable facts:
(1) That Obama is a "light-skinned" black man and that (2) he has "no Negro dialect unless he wanted to have one."
The rationalization of taking offense to these facts averages out to be "We have moved beyond these sort of racial comments". When men's minds have become so befuddled they are no longer able to see shades or hear sounds this will come to pass. The left claims this attribute.
As an illustration of the efficacy of the left's claim to befuddlement I present the following citation from Jeff Davis' Message to the Provisional Congress of the Confederate States of America in April of 1861 regarding African slaves in the South.
To which, a Befuddled Leftist responded:
The Befuddled Leftist's implication that the African slaves in the South were erroneously characterized as having been "brutal savages" is illustrative of the ignorance and bone-deep stupidity the left often holds forth as intellectual discourse. No dictionaries in left-land I take it:
As for the Befuddled Leftist's disdain for Davis' use of the term "superior race"....
In each of the above instances both men spoke obviously correctly in observance of objectively verifiable and obvious fact, yet the left hyperventilated en masse media over Harry Reid's truthful statement and the Befuddled Leftist dismissed Jeff Davis honest remarks entirely without thought or even the modicum of intellectual curiosity that would compel one to pick up Webster's.
Obviously, the exercise of reasoned discourse with the modern left is a solitary endeavor.
(1) That Obama is a "light-skinned" black man and that (2) he has "no Negro dialect unless he wanted to have one."
The rationalization of taking offense to these facts averages out to be "We have moved beyond these sort of racial comments". When men's minds have become so befuddled they are no longer able to see shades or hear sounds this will come to pass. The left claims this attribute.
As an illustration of the efficacy of the left's claim to befuddlement I present the following citation from Jeff Davis' Message to the Provisional Congress of the Confederate States of America in April of 1861 regarding African slaves in the South.
In moral and social condition they had been elevated from brutal savages into docile, intelligent, and civilized agricultural laborers, and supplied not only with bodily comforts but with careful religious instruction.
To which, a Befuddled Leftist responded:
Read it. Yeah, he didn't have a very good grasp of the US Constitution. And of course, there's the "brutal savages" and "superior race" comments. Nice.
The Befuddled Leftist's implication that the African slaves in the South were erroneously characterized as having been "brutal savages" is illustrative of the ignorance and bone-deep stupidity the left often holds forth as intellectual discourse. No dictionaries in left-land I take it:
savage
Function: noun
Date: 15th century
1 : a person belonging to a primitive society
2 : a brutal person
3 : a rude or unmannerly person
As for the Befuddled Leftist's disdain for Davis' use of the term "superior race"....
su·pe·ri·or
Date: 14th century
1 : situated higher up : upper
2 : of higher rank, quality, or importance
race
Function: noun
Date: 1580
1 : a breeding stock of animals
2 a : a family, tribe, people, or nation belonging to the same stock b : a class or kind of people unified by shared interests, habits, or characteristics
3 a : an actually or potentially interbreeding group within a species; also : a taxonomic category (as a subspecies) representing such a group b : breed c : a category of humankind that shares certain distinctive physical traits
In each of the above instances both men spoke obviously correctly in observance of objectively verifiable and obvious fact, yet the left hyperventilated en masse media over Harry Reid's truthful statement and the Befuddled Leftist dismissed Jeff Davis honest remarks entirely without thought or even the modicum of intellectual curiosity that would compel one to pick up Webster's.
Obviously, the exercise of reasoned discourse with the modern left is a solitary endeavor.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)